stress test said 1. mild ischemia involving the mid apical portion of the inferior wall. 2. mild hypokinesis of the apical portion of the inferior wall. Preliminary Report said heart is Normal, outline: normal coronary arteries, they said here is no blockage. want out come of the stress and scan test ?
want cause the stress and scan test false ?
how inform the lied about the stress and scan assessment?
are they legal, liable and Negligence and liability and human resources and they is in the wrong ? and they me to suffer, suffering and misery of the this false test.
Huh?
It would be of serve to us in answering your grill if you'd take a reflective breath, get a hold of yourself, and rephrase. If I attain the jist of it, though, you have a problem because there's a difference between the preliminary and final interpretations of a try-out, perhaps a sestamibi scan.
That's not at adjectives unusual, and it's a bit silly to talk just about anybody "lying." These are not objective test but require a good deal of interpretation, so it's not at adjectives unusual to have the initial reading differ from one done latter with a better fortune at reflection. It's also adjectives for good doctors looking at duplicate test to disagree on the interpretation. And the examination has undeniably not caused any significant distress. That would be due to the underlying pathology for which you had the try-out done.
medicine and strength guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only warning or treatment for any medical conditions.
Related Questions and Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment