please comment against it.
We do have to guard against the "mechanical imperative" of using devices because they're there. People at almost no risk pocket up needed telemetry beds, women within labor can hardly be found not strapped into FHR monitors/toco's, and we truly have to hold NEXUS II to show us when we can do without the come first CT's that weren't available (and without a bigwig difference in outcome) thirty years ago. The inventor himself have to warn against overuse of the Schwann-Ganz catheter, and we say-so that women get poorer point care for angina because they attain fewer catheterizations/stents than men despite knowing that they normally do better without the intervention than next to. And yet, we hold and use those things for a reason, and if we use them perceptively and don't let the risk-managers and lawyer browbeat us into inappropriate use, they are near precisely because they've been shown to be adjectives.
The brutality of technology is due to it's prevalence and intrusion into life. Much close to the pervasive video surveillance in England and the Nationsbank nazis wanting a fingerprint everytime you currency a bloody check, biometrics, cameras everywhere -- and the mechanisms of social engineering such as the surreptitious tracking of DNA profiles and medical accounts are the tools of our beloved 'big brother' as foretold by Orwell.
medicine and form guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only warning or treatment for any medical conditions.
Related Questions and Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment